[ADRN Working Paper Series] Transitional Justice and Reconciliation in Asia
Although there have
been many cases of human rights violations in Asia, once democratized,
countries have made efforts to bring justice to the victims and their families.
Transitional justice measures include official apologies, amendment of history
textbooks and government documents, fact investigation and prosecution of
perpetrators, and establishing truth commissions to restore the honor of the
victims. To suggest policy recommendations for those countries in similar
circumstances, the Asia Democracy Research Network (ADRN) has been conducting case
studies on Transitional Justice and Reconciliation since 2021. As a part of
this project, EAI has published a series composed of three working papers
covering the cases of South Korea, Sri Lanka, and Taiwan.
1. Hun Joon Kim,
Transitional Justice in South Korea [Read] 2. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu,
The Challenges of Transitional Justice in Sri Lanka [Read] 3. Chin-en Wu and
Shih-fen Peng, The Development of Taiwan’s Transitional Justice [Read] “North Korea’s course of actions following the
Russia-Ukraine War” [Global NK Commentary] “North Korea and the
Russia-Ukraine War” “Possible breakdown or erosion of democracy in the
aftermaths of political polarization in Asia”
[ADRN
Issue Briefing] Political Polarization in Asia: Cleavages and Agencies of Polarization
in India, the Philippines, South Korea, and Thailand “New role of
religion for Philippine democracy” [ADRN
Issue Briefing] The 2022 Philippine Elections: Religion and Politics amid Democratic
Uncertainty
“Human Rights Violations Experienced by North
Korean Female Defectors”
[Global NK Research
Review] “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women”
and the Rights of North Korean Female Defectors
“Human Rights Violations Experienced by North
Korean Female Defectors” [Global
NK Special Report] “NK Update for March 2022” "Analyzing Kim Yo-jong`s leadership through motive imagery analysis"
[Global
NK Research Reviews] The Motive Imagery and Leadership of Kim Yo-jong Based on Political Statements on South Korea and the U.S. from 2020 “Changes of Korean Political Landscape” [EAI Special Report]
Reading Minds of the Korean Voters in 2022 (in Korean) 1. Jaesung Ryu, Did Yoon and Ahn’s
Agreement to Merge Candidacies decide the Winner for the Presidential
Election? [Read] 2. Han-wool Jeong, Why did the Huge Ruling
Party get Punished? [Read] 3. Jaemook Lee, Has the Regionalism Formula
of the “Progresive Cheolla, Conservative Kyungbuk” Been Broken? [Read] 4. Jung Hun Han, Did the Youngster in 20s
Change Their Mind Towards the Conservative? [Read] 5. Hannah Kim, Will the Youth Gender
Conflict be Another Conflicting Line over the Ideological Conflict? [Read] 6. Jin Seok Bae, Have the 60s in Korean
Society Remained the Same? [Read] 7. Jung-Ah Gil, How Did the Partisan Voters
Vote at the Most Unlikeable Presidential Election? [Read] 8. Dong-Joon Jung, Did the Authoritarian and Populist Voters convene? [Read] 9. Jung Kim, Will South Korean Democracy
Walk into the Pathways of Pernicious Polarization? [Read] 10. Won Taek Kang, What was the Most
Influential Issue during the 20th Presidential Election? [Read] [EAI Special Report]
Reading Minds of the Korean Voters in 2022 (in Korean) [Issue Briefing] Will
Macron’s Reelection Boost European Sovereignty? (in Korean) EAST ASIA INSTITUTE 1, Sajik-dong 7gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03028, Republic of KoreaTel 82 2 2277 1683 | Fax 82 2 2277 1684 | Email EAICopyright 2021 © EAST ASIA INSTITUTE. All Rights Reserved. 수신거부 Unsubscribe |
